check_circleStudy Completed
Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, Prophylaxis of recurrent venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
Bayer Identifier:
21982
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
EudraCT Number:
Not Available
EU CT Number:
Not Available
Observational Studies in Cancer Associated Thrombosis for Rivaroxaban – United States Cohort
Trial purpose
Patients with active cancer are ~5-fold more likely to develop a venous thromboembolism (VTE) than those without. When VTE occurs, cancer patients carry an up to a 3-fold higher rate of thrombosis recurrence and ~twice the risk of bleeding during anticoagulation. Therefore, it is critical to utilize anticoagulants that optimize efficacy while minimizing bleeding risk when treating cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT).
Guidelines list direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of CAT. The strength-of-recommendation for DOACs is based on data from multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing them to LMWHs to treat CAT, with results suggesting DOACs may reduce thrombosis risk but with potentially more frequent bleeding (particularly in those with certain gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers).
Observational studies evaluating DOACs for CAT treatment have been published, but these studies have been either single-arm, evaluated cancer subtypes not recommended for DOAC treatment, were of limited sample size and/or employed heterogeneous definitions of active cancer. We seek to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus LMWH for CAT treatment in active cancer patients using a large de-identified electronic health record database.
Retrospective cohort analysis using US Optum® De-Identified EHR data. We will use Optum EHR (electronic health records) data from November January 1, 2012 through latest available data (currently September 2020).
Guidelines list direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of CAT. The strength-of-recommendation for DOACs is based on data from multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing them to LMWHs to treat CAT, with results suggesting DOACs may reduce thrombosis risk but with potentially more frequent bleeding (particularly in those with certain gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers).
Observational studies evaluating DOACs for CAT treatment have been published, but these studies have been either single-arm, evaluated cancer subtypes not recommended for DOAC treatment, were of limited sample size and/or employed heterogeneous definitions of active cancer. We seek to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus LMWH for CAT treatment in active cancer patients using a large de-identified electronic health record database.
Retrospective cohort analysis using US Optum® De-Identified EHR data. We will use Optum EHR (electronic health records) data from November January 1, 2012 through latest available data (currently September 2020).
Key Participants Requirements
Sex
AllAge
18 - N/ATrial summary
Enrollment Goal
3708Trial Dates
July 2021 - March 2022Phase
N/ACould I Receive a placebo
NoProducts
Xarelto (Rivaroxaban, BAY59-7939)Accepts Healthy Volunteer
N/AWhere to participate
Status | Institution | Location |
---|---|---|
Completed | Many Locations | Many Locations, 06093, United States |
Primary Outcome
- Risk of recurrent VTEdate_rangeTime Frame:at 3 month after treatment
- Any clinically-relevant bleeding-related hospitalizationCunningham algorithm for identification of bleeding-associated hospitalizationsdate_rangeTime Frame:at 3 month after treatment
- All-cause mortalitydate_rangeTime Frame:at 3 month after treatment
Secondary Outcome
- Recurrent VTE at 6- and 12-months post-index VTEdate_rangeTime Frame:at 6 and 12 months post-index VTE
- Composite of any major or clinically-relevant nonmajor bleeding-related hospitalization at 6- and 12-months post-index VTEincluding: - Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) - Critical organ bleeding (e.g., intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intraarticular, or pericardial bleeding or intramuscular with compartment syndrome) - Extracranial bleeding-related hospitalizationsdate_rangeTime Frame:at 6 and 12 months post-index VTE
- Any clinically-relevant bleeding-related hospitalizationper the Cunningham algorithm for identification of bleeding-associated hospitalizationsdate_rangeTime Frame:at 6 and 12 months
- Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)date_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
- Critical organ bleedingdate_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
- Extracranial bleeding-related hospitalizationsdate_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
- All-cause mortality at 6- and 12-months.date_rangeTime Frame:at 6 and 12 months
- Incidence rates of recurrent VTEIncidence rates of recurrent VTE in DOAC and LMWH patients experiencing CAT regardless of the bleeding risk associated with cancer type.date_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
- Incidence rates any clinically-relevant bleeding-related to recurrent VTEIncidence rates of any clinically-relevant bleeding-related in DOAC and LMWH patients experiencing CAT regardless of the bleeding risk associated with cancer type.date_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
- All cause-mortalityIncidence rates of all cause-mortality in DOAC and LMWH patients experiencing CAT regardless of the bleeding risk associated with cancer type.date_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
- Duration of anticoagulation treatmentdate_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
- DOAC discontinuation rates at 3-, 6- and 12-months follow-update_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
- LMWH discontinuation rates at 3-, 6- and 12-months follow-update_rangeTime Frame:at 3, 6 and 12 months
Trial design
Trial Type
ObservationalIntervention Type
DrugTrial Purpose
TreatmentAllocation
N/ABlinding
N/AAssignment
N/ATrial Arms
N/A